Study: AudioEye detects up to 2.5x more issues than other tools
Get ReportAccessibility Score: What It Measures and What a Good Score Looks Like
Accessibility scores give websites a measurable starting point for evaluating how well they work for people with disabilities — but knowing what the number actually means takes a little context. This article covers how scores are calculated, what a good score looks like, and why the tool you use to measure accessibility matters.
Author: Jeff Curtis, Sr. Content Manager
Published: 05/13/2026
)
Most website owners assume digital accessibility is a pass/fail question. It isn’t. Accessibility exists on a spectrum; an accessibility score is how that spectrum gets measured, giving you a concrete, comparable number that reflects how well your site works for people with disabilities.
Below, we’ll explain what an accessibility score is and how it’s measured, what a good score is, and what to do with your results.
What is an Accessibility Score?
An accessibility score is a numeric rating that reflects how well a website or page conforms to accessibility standards or practices (such as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines(opens in a new tab) (WCAG) or the Americans with Disabilities Act(opens in a new tab) (ADA)).
Scores are typically expressed on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating fewer barriers for people with disabilities.
How is an Accessibility Score Calculated?
Accessibility scores are generated by automated scanning tools that evaluate a page against a defined ruleset, typically WCAG 2.1 Level AA, Section 508, or a proprietary set of rules unique to the tool. The scanner crawls the page’s code and flags elements that violate those rules: missing alt text, insufficient color contrast, unlabeled form fields, missing ARIA attributes, and other common accessibility issues. Next steps depend on the tool; however, most log violations categorize them by type, and assign a severity weight before providing a final score.
What automated tools can’t detect is only a portion of what accessibility actually requires. Scripted scanners evaluate code — they cannot evaluate experience. Whether a keyboard user can complete a multi-step form without getting trapped, whether a screen reader announces dynamic content changes in a logical order, whether error messages are genuinely understandable to someone with a cognitive disability — these require human judgment.
More simply, a page can score well on an automated scan and still present real barriers to disabled users.
This is also why two tools can return different scores for the same page. Each tool makes its own decisions about which rules to include, which WCAG conformance level to follow, how to weight severity, and how to calculate the final number. One tool might penalize a missing skip link more heavily than another. A tool built around WCAG 2.2 will flag issues that a WCAG 2.0-based tool won’t detect at all. The score is always a reflection of that tool’s ruleset, not an objective, universal measure of accessibility.
What is a Good Accessibility Score?
There is no single score that universally defines an accessible website. As mentioned above, different tools use different scales, different rulesets, and different definitions of what counts as a critical violation.
That said, practical benchmarks have emerged. A score of 90 or above is widely cited as a passing target. WCAG 2.1 Level AA conformance is the legal and regulatory benchmark that matters most for ADA compliance in the U.S. and EN 301 549 compliance in the EU. For most compliance teams, the operational goal is simple: zero critical violations in whatever tool they’re using to monitor their site.
The more useful question isn’t what score is “good” in the abstract — it’s what the score tells you about risk. A score of 78 with no critical violations on high-traffic pages is different from a score of 85 with a critical violation on a checkout form. Context determines priority. Scores are a starting point for fixes, not a final verdict on whether or not your site is accessible.
How Different Tools Calculate Accessibility Scores
The tool you use to check accessibility shapes not just the number you see, but what gets flagged, what gets missed, and what your next steps are.
What a score means in practice depends on who’s reading it. For example, a developer sees a list of specific failures to prioritize and fix. A compliance manager sees a legal risk indicator — how exposed the organization is to an ADA demand letter or EAA enforcement action. An executive sees a measure of organizational liability. The number is the same; the implications are different.
Know Your Score. Fix What Matters
Your accessibility score tells you where you stand. It doesn’t fix the problems, and it doesn’t fix the problems, and it doesn’t protect you from legal risk on its own.
That’s where AudioEye comes in. Our platform combines 24/7 automated monitoring, Expert Audits, and custom fixes to resolve roughly 97% of issues through automation and expert-written custom fixes, before your developers ever get involved. We detect 2.5x more issues than competing tools, so you’re not just scoring well on a scan. You’re actually more accessible.
Ready to move from a number to a solution? Start with a free accessibility scan, then talk to one of our experts about how to improve your score.
Frequently Asked Questions
Share Article
)
)
)